Re: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nice Work Mark !

I don't see any tuning about sharding in the config file sample

(osd_op_num_threads_per_shard,osd_op_num_shards,...)

as you only use 1 ssd for the bench, I think it should improve results for hammer ?



----- Mail original -----
De: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
À: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Mardi 17 Février 2015 18:37:01
Objet: [ceph-users] Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance	comparison

Hi All, 

I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look 
at how SSD backed OSD performance has changed across our LTS releases. 
This is just looking at RADOS performance and not RBD or RGW. It also 
doesn't offer any real explanations regarding the results. It's just a 
first high level step toward understanding some of the behaviors folks 
on the mailing list have reported over the last couple of releases. I 
hope you find it useful. 

Mark 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux