----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Yehuda Sadeh" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:05:24 AM > Subject: rgw and the next giant release > > Hi Yehuda, > > The rgw teuthology suite for the next giant release as found in > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/giant-backports came back (see > http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-02_23:56:11-rgw-giant-backports---basic-multi) > with one environmental error > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501#teuthology-run-6b08a729540c61f3c8b15c5a3ce9382634bf800c-february-2015. > > Do you think it is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Yes. Thanks, Yehuda > > Note that the integration branch now contains all the rgw pull requests > targeting giant as listed here: > > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/giant#included-and-tested-in-integration-branch > > Which includes cherry picks I did for the following as you suggested: > > - 9918 RGW-Swift: SubUser access permissions, does not seems to workminor > - 10103 swift tests failing > upgrade:dumpling-firefly-x:parallel-next-distro-basic-multi run > - 10471 rgw: metadata sync doesn't create subusers correctly > - 9254 rgw: civetweb requires explicit \r\n for http headers > - 9478 Incorrect content type in response header > - 9479 ETag is not included in the XML response to put object copy > operationminor > - 9877 In some cases it's possible for rgw to segfault on http COPY > - 5595 object has a Content-Type, but its content_type property is > not shown in Swift object enumeration > - 9907 Normal radosgw-admin: can't disable max_size quota > - 9973 Validation of Swift DLO manifest object ETag doesn't match > OpenStack Swift behavior > - 10307 rgw: setting bucket attributes (swift POST on bucket) > sometimes failminor > - 9587 ceph-radosgw sysvinit script on EL6 cannot set ulimit > > Your original list included three more: > > - 9878 rhel7 s3-tests fail due to missing reason > - 10329 rgw: s3 need to return SignatureDoesNotMatch instead of AccessDenied > - 10334 rgw: s3 need to return InvalidAccessKeyId instead of AccessDenied > > but you wrote that 10329 and 10334 do not need backporting and 9878 was > already backported. > > Cheers > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
