Re: hammer is frozen

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

In my opinion this should have been merged: it was ready before the feature freeze.

Cheers

On 06/02/2015 13:25, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
>> If there is something exceptional that hasn't made it in yet and is low-risk,
>> plea your case,
> 
> We would like to contribute our following code to the nearest stable release
> Hammer, and we believe that our code has sufficiently low risk.
> 
>  mSHEC : multiple Shingled Erasure Code #3534
>  https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3534
> 
> One of the reasons why we think it has low risk is that we have already
> finished extended tests shown below assuming a product use case.
> 
>  Test items done:
>   * erasure code plugin I/F tests (TestErasureCodeShec.cc)
>   * exhaustive parity layouts tests (TestErasureCodeShec_all.cc)
>   * thread safety tests (TestErasureCodeShec_thread.cc)
>   * tests on a real ceph cluster
>      - pool creation/deletion
>      - read/write
>      - recovery (up to N multiple failures)
> 
> Another reason is that the code is just a plugin, which is completely
> isolated from the core of Ceph and has no risks for users who do not
> need to use it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Takeshi Miyamae
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sage Weil
> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015 5:51 AM
> To: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: hammer is frozen
> 
> I created the branch on Monday, but am traveling and forgot to send an email.  This means we're not merging new features until we have a handle on the testing and the QA results are looking good.
> 
> Specifically:
> 
> - There is a 'hammer' ceph.git branch.  Please target any bug fixes at
>   this.
> 
> - The 'next' branch is deleted for the time being (see above)
> 
> - Do not merge any new features to master; not yet.  It's too confusing
>   and we have enough work to do stabilizing things.
> 
> - There are still several pull requests open that are bug fixes and target
>   master that should get merged once they are tested, so we will probably
>   merge hammer and master together periodically to avoid doing all the
>   merged manually.  (Another reason not to merge any new code into master
>   that does not target hammer.)
> 
> - We're using the 'hammer' milestone on github to track what to pay
>   attention to.  Please help keep it in sync with the open pull
>   requests that are hammer-bound vs future work for infernalis.
> 
> If there is something exceptional that hasn't made it in yet and is low-risk, plea your case, but no promises.  Bribery in the form of fixes for open bugs can be effective.  :)
> 
> Thanks!
> sage
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux