On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 02/02/2015 14:48, Yan, Zheng wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-29_15:39:38-rbd-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/730029/ hangs on dumpling and got killed after two days. >>> >>> Although workloads/rbd_fsx_cache_writethrough.yaml was running with the thrasher, it does not seem to be related to http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 : it was running on a mira070 (16GB RAM) and plana78 (8GB RAM). >>> >>> I don't see anything in https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/blob/master/tasks/rbd_fsx.py that would suggest it needs backporting a fix to the ceph-qa-suite branch of dumpling. >>> >>> I browsed the commits related to RBD that are in the dumpling-backports branch ( see here for the list I used http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560 ). I don't see anything in the issues that need backporting to dumpling either. >>> >>> Another run of this specific test has been scheduled to check if it always happens at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-02-02_13:58:32-rbd:thrash:workloads:rbd_fsx_cache_writethrough.yaml-dumpling-backports---basic-multi/ >>> >>> Does that ring a bell by any chance ? >>> >> >> maybe it's the same as http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10498 >> > > I hoped it would be but from what I read the bug crashes and creates a core dump, right ? What I'm seeing is the test hanging indefinitely and no core. Whether it's crashing or not depends on the nature of the test. The root cause is just a hang; some things might crash on timeouts but others won't. (I don't think I recall seeing a crash on that bug report anyway, though.) -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
