Hi David, I see you created a pull requests for backporting documentation to firefly https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3521 And also three issues to track the backport on firefly, giant and future hammer: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10676 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10677 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10678 I'm not sure why http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10678 is necessary ? Since there does not seem to be an issue associated with the man page updates being backported, I understand why you created http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10676. I would have expected to see, in the backport field of this issue, the string "firefly,giant" to note that the intention is to backport to these releases. I think that's what we usually do for backporting. Is there a specific reason for creating http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10677 ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
