I would.prefer just set the memstore_device_size to a huge constant, say 1000G. So it will not make any trouble😊
---- Blinick, Stephen L编写 ----
That fix looks good and I also verified it works. When I found that bug originally I fixed it, but it didn't work and I debugged a bit further. The reason was rpmbuild untar's the /SOURCES archive and builds from that -- and so my change didn't get picked up. Too much automation :)
Mark -- if you're doing the Memstore testing still, you can use this fix but also need to make sure to specify a large enough memstore "device".. i.e. over 4GB if you're going to be writing for 60 seconds with 4K objects at 20K IOPS.
Thanks,
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: Chen, Xiaoxi
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 1:39 AM
To: mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx; Blinick, Stephen L; Ceph Development
Subject: RE: Memstore issue on v0.91
This is due to the implicit type cast in the compiler, when
st->f_blocks < (used_bytes/st->f_bsize),
the minus should be a negative ,but the compiler take it as an unsigned value
Fix is proposed in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3451
Xiaoxi
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Blinick, Stephen L; Ceph Development
Subject: Re: Memstore issue on v0.91
On 01/21/2015 01:48 AM, Blinick, Stephen L wrote:
> Moved to 0.91 yesterday and ran into some issues, with a Memstore OSD of default size. After a few hundred K OPS client gets a FULL message and the avail space looks like:
>
> [root@cephtestnode0 bmpa]# rados df
> pool name KB objects clones degraded unfound rd rd KB wr wr KB
> rbd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> testmemstore 1505052 376263 0 0 0 0 0 376263 1505052
> total used 1494247 376263
> total avail 18014398508987737
> total space 1000000
>
> I was looking at pull request #2836 and found a case where there could be an unsigned int underflow in MemStore.cc:statfs:
>
> st->f_bfree = st->f_bavail = MAX((st->f_blocks - used_bytes /
> st->f_bsize), 0);
>
> But that wasn't the final issue.. I put some asserts where used_bytes could underflow as well and didn't catch anything. I will keep digging but wanted to find out if anyone else was seeing the issue as well.
FWIW, I hit this yesterday too. I hadn't started debugging it yet though. Looks like you are farther along than I am, thanks Stephen! :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel"
> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo
> info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z��u���ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
