Re: 10 times higher disk load with btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 5 Jan 2015, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> 
> Am 05.01.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Stefan Priebe:
> > Hi devs,
> > 
> > while btrfs is now declared as stable ;-) i wanted to retest btrfs on
> > our production cluster on 2 out of 54 osds. So if they crash it doesn't
> > hurt.
> > 
> > While if those OSDs run XFS have spikes of 20MB/s every 4-7s. The same
> > OSDs after formatting them with btrfs have spikes of 190MB/s every 4-7s.
> > 
> > Why does just another filesystem raises the disk load by a factor of 10?
> 
> OK this seems to happen cause ceph is creating every 5s a new subvolume /
> snap. Is this really expected / needed?

You can disable it with

 filestore btrfs snap = false

I'm curious how much this drops the load down; originally the 
snaps were no more expensive than a regular sync but perhaps this 
has changed...

sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux