Re: teuthology gevent version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zack,

It turns out that using a gevent threadpool was not a good idea therefore I won't pursue this lead. But I keep the answer in mind, just in case :-)

Thanks !

On 17/11/2014 18:21, Zack Cerza wrote:
> Hey Loic,
> 
> I actually don't know if it would cause problems or not. It would be
> useful to do some testing with the new version: maybe create a branch
> with a patch to requirements.txt to bump the version, run the unit
> tests and then some jobs to see if things break?
> 
> Thanks,
> Zack
> 
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Zack,
>>
>> At the moment teuthology requires gevent == 0.13.6 ( https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/blob/master/requirements.txt#L2 ). Would it be a problem to upgrade to a more recent version ? I'd like to use https://github.com/gevent/gevent/blob/master/gevent/threadpool.py which was introduced in 1.0b1 http://gevent.org/changelog.html#release-1-0b1-jan-10-2012
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux