Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: allow direct dispatch to a driver specific workqueue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:40:47PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> The above two aren't enough because the big problem is that
>> drivers need a per-request work structure instead of 'hctx->run_work',
>> otherwise there are at most NR_CPUS concurrent submissions.
>>
>> So the per-request work structure should be exposed to blk-mq
>> too for the kind of usage, such as .blk_mq_req_work(req) callback
>> in case of BLK_MQ_F_WORKQUEUE.
>
> Hmm.  Maybe a better option is to just add a flag to never defer
> ->queue_rq to a workqueue and let drivers handle the it?

That should work, but might lose potential merge benefit of defer.


Thanks,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux