On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, Amon Ott wrote: > Am 13.10.2014 20:16, schrieb Sage Weil: > > We've been doing a lot of work on CephFS over the past few months. This > > is an update on the current state of things as of Giant. > ... > > * Either the kernel client (kernel 3.17 or later) or userspace (ceph-fuse > > or libcephfs) clients are in good working order. > > Thanks for all the work and specially for concentrating on CephFS! We > have been watching and testing for years by now and really hope to > change our Clusters to CephFS soon. > > For kernel maintenance reasons, we only want to run longterm stable > kernels. And for performance reasons and because of severe known > problems we want to avoid Fuse. How good are our chances of a stable > system with the kernel client in the latest longterm kernel 3.14? Will > there be further bugfixes or feature backports? We haven't been backporting CephFS bug fixes to the stable kernels the same way we've been doing RBD bugs; it's a bit of a chore. This can be done retroactively but no promises. Probably 3.14 makes the most sense. The RHEL7/CentOS7 kernel is also a likely target. sage -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
