Re: is function get_net_marked_down right?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Cheng Wei-Chung wrote:
> Dear all:
> 
> I have seen this function few days.
> OSDMap::Incremental::get_net_marked_down
> 
> There is something strange I don't know why.
> 
> why we increase n when we got state and previous state is UP?
> if (p->second & CEPH_OSD_UP) {
>       if (previous->is_up(p->first))
>         n++;  // marked down
>       else
>         n--;  // marked up
> }
> 
> This function aims to help check whether the osd can be mark down or not, right?
> 
> For counting the osd that state is down, the above function is
> counting the osd that state is up?
> 
> I would like to know there is some minor error or something I don't
> really understand.

For lame historical reasons the CEPH_OSD_UP flag in the incremental 
*toggles* the up/down state ... it either means the OSD came up or that it 
went down.

sage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux