Re: set_alloc_hint old osds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Samuel Just <sam.just@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9419
>
> librbd unconditionally sends set_alloc_hint.  Do we require that users
> upgrade the osds first?  Also, should the primary respond with
> ENOTSUPP if any replicas don't support it?

Something closer to the second option, I think...but then you run into
the problem where maybe the PG gets moved from a set of new OSDs to a
set of old ones that don't support the op. :/ I think for anything
that goes to disk you need to go through a full features-in-the-osdmap
process like we did for erasure coding.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux