Here is what we have in vps.yaml now:
overrides:
ceph:
conf:
global:
osd heartbeat grace: 40
What do we want to add?
~
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>> Yeah, looking at these logs, it really seem that it's just that things
>> are going slow on these machines and it's hitting timeouts. The fix is
>> ok with me, although I'd rather have it adjusted per machine type
>> (somehow).
>
> There is a vps.yaml that bumps up another timeout, so we could put it
> there. Right now it lives on the teuthology machine
> (~teuthworker/vps.yaml I think?), but perhaps we should stick it in
> ceph-qa-suite.git somewhere ...
>
> sage
>
>>
>> Yehuda
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi Yehuda,
>> >
>> > It looks like increasing the rgw idle timeout makes the problem go away ( https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/79 and http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8988 ). It previously was 300 sec which looks like a large value already. Does this fix / workaround make sense to you ?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On 10/08/2014 10:46, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> >> Hi Yehuda,
>> >>
>> >> In the past few months the swift tests failed randomly and I was unfortunately unable to figure out why. Here are a few examples:
>> >>
>> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2014-08-08_12:17:30-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split-wip-9025-chunk-remapping-testing-basic-vps/406944
>> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2014-08-08_12:17:30-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split-wip-9025-chunk-remapping-testing-basic-vps/406941
>> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2014-08-08_12:17:30-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split-wip-9025-chunk-remapping-testing-basic-vps/406946
>> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2014-08-08_12:17:30-upgrade:firefly-x:stress-split-wip-9025-chunk-remapping-testing-basic-vps/406947
>> >>
>> >> and it has happened on every upgrade test run since I can remember. I fail to see a pattern and cannot figure out what the real problem is. It would be really great if you could take a look. Even a hunch or a tip would be greatly appreciated :-)
>> >>
>> >> You can find more context in
>> >>
>> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8988
>> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8016
>> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7799
>> >>
>> >> and discussions at
>> >>
>> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg19933.html
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lo?c Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> >
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
