Re: KeyFileStore ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+1 
----- "Sage Weil" <sweil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Anyway, at the end of the day, small writes or overwrites would still
> be 
> journaled, but large writes or large new objects would not, which
> would (I 
> think) be a pretty big improvement.

Yes.

  Overall, I think the design will
> be 
> much simpler to reason about, and there are several potential avenues
> to 
> be clever and make improvements.  I'm not sure we can say the same
> about 
> the FileStore design, which suffers from the fact that it has evolved
> 
> slowly over the last 9 years or so.
> 

-- 
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel.  734-761-4689 
fax.  734-769-8938 
cel.  734-216-5309 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux