Hi sage , This maybe due to $(shell) is a feature of GNU make , I think there are two solutions: 1) run the script at configure time rather than at run time. 2) $(shell (./build_tools/build_detect_version)) will generated util/build_version.cc , the file only contain some version info (git version , compile time) , since we may not care about thess infos , we can remove this line from Makefile.am , generate util/build_version.cc by myself. Cheers, xinxin -----Original Message----- From: Sage Weil [mailto:sweil@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:08 AM To: Shu, Xinxin Cc: Mark Nelson; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: First attempt at rocksdb monitor store stress testing By the way, I'm getting closer to getting wip-rocksdb in a state where it can be merged, but it is failing to build due to this line: $(shell (./build_tools/build_detect_version)) in Makefile.am which results in automake: warnings are treated as errors warning: Makefile.am:59: shell (./build_tools/build_detect_version: non-POSIX variable name Makefile.am:59: (probably a GNU make extension) Makefile.am: installing './depcomp' autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Any suggestions? You can see these build results at http://ceph.com/gitbuilder.cgi http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/log.cgi?log=92212c722100065922468e4185759be0435877ff sage On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > Does your report base on wip-rocksdb-mark branch? > > Cheers, > xinxin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Nelson > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 12:56 AM > To: Shu, Xinxin; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: First attempt at rocksdb monitor store stress testing > > Hi Xinxin, > > Thanks, I'll give it a try. I want to figure out what's going on in Rocksdb when the test stalls with leveled compaction. In the mean time, here are the test results with spinning disks and SSDs: > > http://nhm.ceph.com/mon-store-stress/Monitor_Store_Stress_Short_Tests. > pdf > > Mark > > On 07/27/2014 11:45 PM, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > > Hi mark, > > > > I tested this option on my setup , same issue happened , I will dig into it , if you want to get info log , there is a workaround, set this option to none: > > > > Rocksdb_log = "" > > > > Cheers, > > xinxin > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 12:10 AM > > To: Shu, Xinxin; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: First attempt at rocksdb monitor store stress testing > > > > Hi Xinxin, > > > > I'm trying to enable the rocksdb log file as described in config_opts using: > > > > rocksdb_log = <path to log file> > > > > The file gets created but is empty. Any ideas? > > > > Mark > > > > On 07/24/2014 08:28 PM, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > >> Hi mark, > >> > >> I am looking forward to your results on SSDs . > >> rocksdb generates a crc of data to be written , this cannot be switch off (but can be subsititued with xxhash), there are two options , Option. verify_checksums_in_compaction and ReadOptions. verify_checksums, If we disable these two options , i think cpu usage will goes down . If we use universal compaction , this is not friendly with read operation. > >> > >> Btw , can you list your rocksdb configuration? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> xinxin > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Mark Nelson [mailto:mark.nelson@xxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:45 AM > >> To: Shu, Xinxin; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: Re: First attempt at rocksdb monitor store stress testing > >> > >> Earlier today I modified the rocksdb options so I could enable universal compaction. Over all performance is lower but I don't see the hang/stall in the middle of the test either. Instead the disk is basically pegged with 100% writes. I suspect average latency is higher than leveldb, but the highest latency is about 5-6s while we were seeing 30s spikes for leveldb with levelled (heh) compaction. > >> > >> I haven't done much tuning either way yet. It may be that if we keep level 0 and level 1 roughly the same size we can reduce stalls in the levelled setups. It will also be interesting to see what happens in these tests on SSDs. > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> On 07/24/2014 06:13 AM, Mark Nelson wrote: > >>> Hi Xinxin, > >>> > >>> Thanks! I wonder as well if it might be interesting to expose the > >>> options related to universal compaction? It looks like rocksdb > >>> provides a lot of interesting knobs you can adjust! > >>> > >>> Mark > >>> > >>> On 07/24/2014 12:08 AM, Shu, Xinxin wrote: > >>>> Hi mark, > >>>> > >>>> I think this maybe related to 'verify_checksums' config option > >>>> ,when ReadOptions is initialized, default this option is true , > >>>> all data read from underlying storage will be verified against > >>>> corresponding checksums, however, this option cannot be > >>>> configured in wip-rocksdb branch. I will modify code to make this option configurable . > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> xinxin > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> [mailto:ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark > >>>> Nelson > >>>> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:14 AM > >>>> To: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> Subject: First attempt at rocksdb monitor store stress testing > >>>> > >>>> Hi Guys, > >>>> > >>>> So I've been interested lately in leveldb 99th percentile latency > >>>> (and the amount of write amplification we are seeing) with leveldb. > >>>> Joao mentioned he has written a tool called mon-store-stress in > >>>> wip-leveldb-misc to try to provide a means to roughly guess at > >>>> what's happening on the mons under heavy load. I cherry-picked > >>>> it over to wip-rocksdb and after a couple of hacks was able to > >>>> get everything built and running with some basic tests. There > >>>> was little tuning done and I don't know how realistic this > >>>> workload is, so don't assume this means anything yet, but some initial results are here: > >>>> > >>>> http://nhm.ceph.com/mon-store-stress/First%20Attempt.pdf > >>>> > >>>> Command that was used to run the tests: > >>>> > >>>> ./ceph-test-mon-store-stress --mon-keyvaluedb <leveldb|rocksdb> > >>>> --write-min-size 50K --write-max-size 2M --percent-write 70 > >>>> --percent-read 30 --keep-state --test-seed 1406137270 --stop-at > >>>> 5000 foo > >>>> > >>>> The most interesting bit right now is that rocksdb seems to be > >>>> hanging in the middle of the test (left it running for several > >>>> hours). CPU usage on one core was quite high during the hang. > >>>> Profiling using perf with dwarf symbols I see: > >>>> > >>>> - 49.14% ceph-test-mon-s ceph-test-mon-store-stress [.] > >>>> unsigned int > >>>> rocksdb::crc32c::ExtendImpl<&rocksdb::crc32c::Fast_CRC32>(unsigne > >>>> d > >>>> int, char const*, unsigned long) > >>>> - unsigned int > >>>> rocksdb::crc32c::ExtendImpl<&rocksdb::crc32c::Fast_CRC32>(unsigne > >>>> d > >>>> int, char const*, unsigned long) > >>>> 51.70% > >>>> rocksdb::ReadBlockContents(rocksdb::RandomAccessFile*, > >>>> rocksdb::Footer const&, rocksdb::ReadOptions const&, > >>>> rocksdb::BlockHandle const&, rocksdb::BlockContents*, > >>>> rocksdb::Env*, > >>>> bool) > >>>> 48.30% > >>>> rocksdb::BlockBasedTableBuilder::WriteRawBlock(rocksdb::Slice > >>>> const&, rocksdb::CompressionType, rocksdb::BlockHandle*) > >>>> > >>>> Not sure what's going on yet, may need to try to enable > >>>> logging/debugging in rocksdb. Thoughts/Suggestions welcome. :) > >>>> > >>>> Mark > >>>> -- > >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > >>>> in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More > >>>> majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
