Re: ARM benchmarks for the erasure code plugin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27/06/2014 19:23, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
> Yeah, they should be up and available as we are not testing them anymore. They do have issues where they randomly went down before and if any of them are down feel free to to hit me up and I can get them fixed up.
> 
> says37->saya44 are the newer machines that have the faster CPU's and more ram and stuff (newer arch).

Thanks for the tip. I'll beg Mark to lend me one ;-)

> 
> On 06/27/2014 10:16 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>> The machine types are tala and saya; you should be able to grab one with
>> teuthology-lock.  Hopefully they are up...
>>
>> sage
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sandon,
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to get access to an ARM based machine to run erasure code plugins benchmarks ? The idea is to get a baseline similar to what https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/1875 shows and figure out where we stand. At this point any ARM processor will do. Eventually we will want to give NEON[1] enabled processors a try but right now we have nothing take advantage of that ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NEON_%28instruction_set%29#NEON
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Lo?c Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>
>>>
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux