Hi Greg, Am 26.06.2014 02:17, schrieb Gregory Farnum: > Sorry we let this drop; we've all been busy traveling and things. > > There have been a lot of changes to librados between Dumpling and > Firefly, but we have no idea what would have made it slower. Can you > provide more details about how you were running these tests? it's just a normal fio run: fio --ioengine=rbd --bs=4k --name=foo --invalidate=0 --readwrite=randwrite --iodepth=32 --rbdname=fio_test2 --pool=teststor --runtime=90 --numjobs=32 --direct=1 --group Running one time with firefly libs and one time with dumpling libs. Traget is always the same pool on a firefly ceph storage. Stefan > -Greg > Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> while testint firefly i cam into the sitation where i had a client where the >> latest dumpling packages where installed (0.67.9). >> >> As my pool has hashppool false and the tunables are set to default it can >> talk to my firefly ceph sotrage. >> >> For random 4k writes using fio with librbd and 32 jobs and an iodepth of 32. >> >> I get these results: >> >> librbd / librados2 from dumpling: >> write: io=3020.9MB, bw=103083KB/s, iops=25770, runt= 30008msec >> WRITE: io=3020.9MB, aggrb=103082KB/s, minb=103082KB/s, maxb=103082KB/s, >> mint=30008msec, maxt=30008msec >> >> librbd / librados2 from firefly: >> write: io=7344.3MB, bw=83537KB/s, iops=20884, runt= 90026msec >> WRITE: io=7344.3MB, aggrb=83537KB/s, minb=83537KB/s, maxb=83537KB/s, >> mint=90026msec, maxt=90026msec >> >> Stefan >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
