Hi Sage, On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:38:06 Sage Weil wrote: > In commit 012bb5fb5bbc76e5a2c5037dc0c6558f0b1b0a45 we added a dependency > on /lib/lsb/init-functions which is not present on rpm-based machines. > This thread > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-August/msg01920.html > > proposes a workaround but there is also some concern about this being > slow. Do you know what the best practice is here? I'm not familiar with > this area. I can't tell what is the best practice on Red Hat. On Debian such include is a standard practice. > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8028 I just updated the above ticket with the following: This is because of missing depends on "lsb-base". I reckon it (or similar package) should be available on RHEL/CentOS. Besides my commit is not a problem as other init scripts already had similar include. So to me it looks like RPM packaging issue... I hope this helps... -- Cheers, Dmitry Smirnov. --- Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -- Philip K. Dick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
