Hello, We recently bumped again into the same assertion error. Do you have any indications or update regarding the cause ? On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:26:15AM -0800, Noah Watkins wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Josh Durgin <josh.durgin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That's a good idea. This particular assert in a Mutex is almost always > > a use-after-free of the Mutex or structure containing it though. > > I think that a use-after-free will also throw an EINVAL (assuming it > isn't a pathalogical case) as pthread_mutex_lock checks an > initialization magic variable. I think that particular mutex isn't > initialized with flags that would cause any of the other possible > return values. Kind regards, -- Filippos <philipgian@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
