Re: [PATCH] rbd: assert next_completion under completion_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2014 08:47 AM, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> completion_lock is there specifically to protect next_completion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <ilya.dryomov@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/block/rbd.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index fbf41e058bfd..f044fab3da99 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -2123,12 +2123,12 @@ static void rbd_img_obj_callback(struct rbd_obj_request *obj_request)
>  	rbd_assert(img_request->obj_request_count > 0);
>  	rbd_assert(which != BAD_WHICH);
>  	rbd_assert(which < img_request->obj_request_count);
> -	rbd_assert(which >= img_request->next_completion);
>  
>  	spin_lock_irq(&img_request->completion_lock);
> -	if (which != img_request->next_completion)
> +	if (which > img_request->next_completion)
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	rbd_assert(which == img_request->next_completion);
>  	for_each_obj_request_from(img_request, obj_request) {
>  		rbd_assert(more);
>  		rbd_assert(which < img_request->obj_request_count);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux