On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 4:27 AM, huang jun <hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: hjwsm1989<hjwsm1989@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > --
> > diff --git a/ceph.spec.in b/ceph.spec.in
> > index 3caa849..facba6c 100644
> > --- a/ceph.spec.in
> > +++ b/ceph.spec.in
> > @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ fi
> > @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ fi
> > %{_libdir}/rados-classes/libcls_log.so*
> > diff --git a/ceph.spec.in b/ceph.spec.in
> > index 3caa849..facba6c 100644
> > --- a/ceph.spec.in
> > +++ b/ceph.spec.in
> > @@ -429,6 +429,7 @@ fi
> > %{_libdir}/rados-classes/libcls_replica_log.so*
> > %{_libdir}/rados-classes/libcls_statelog.so*
> > +%{_libdir}/rados-classes/libcls_user.so*
>
> Thanks for catching this.
>
>
> > @@ -690,6 +689,7 @@ fi
> > %{_bindir}/ceph_test_rados_list_parallel
> > %{_bindir}/ceph_test_rados_open_pools_parallel
> > %{_bindir}/ceph_test_rados_watch_notify
> > +%{_bindir}/ceph_test_rgw_manifest
> > %{_bindir}/ceph_test_signal_handlers
> > %{_bindir}/ceph_test_snap_mapper
>
>
> It seems like we have to deal with this sort of thing over and over.
> Anyone have objections to simply using a wildcard to capture all the
> test files? Something like %{_bindir}/ceph_test_* ?
Sounds good to me. This is only stuff that 'make install' is putting in
place right?
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
