Re: question for the new ceph-osd key/value backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/12/13 19:09, Sage Weil wrote:

That is one part.  The current strategy of layering on top of a file
system and using a write-ahead journal makes sense given the existing
linux fs building blocks, but is far from an optimal solution for many
workloads.  A k/v interface based on something leveldb probably performs
much better for many small-object use-cases.  Also, a k/v backend can take
advatange of emerging non-block storage interfaces like NVMKV, Kinetic,
new libraries like rocksdb, etc.


Yeah, the pluggable backend approach seems like a really good plan.

Regards

Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux