Or, MSVC, frankly. ----- "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes. But you may wish to think about mingwXX porting rather than > Cygwin, > if you prefer native results. > > Matt > > ----- "Noah Watkins" <noah.watkins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > curious if the discussion on windows portability is relevant here > or > > if > > > it's better treated as a separate but related effort. > > > > The kernel space talk that's been tossed around probably isn't > > relevant, but I'd be nice to learn about cygwin porting if anyone > has > > knowledge in this area. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > ceph-devel" > > in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > Matt Benjamin > The Linux Box > 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 > Ann Arbor, MI 48104 > > http://linuxbox.com > > tel. 734-761-4689 > fax. 734-769-8938 > cel. 734-216-5309 > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
