David, I guess that's really a better question for Sage. He sent my branch (which includes your changes) plus a whole slew of things over to Linus. I'm going guess that a small follow on patch is simplest but I'll let him comment. Here's the original pull request: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137849853203101&w=2 Also, so far after making this change everything is peachy and theres no other regressions. P.S: This is a resend because I did no hit reply to ALL, sorry for the spam David. On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:18 AM, David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I think that change does the trick. I had it running on the same >> machine for 5 hours and had the kernel forcefully drop some of the >> inodes in the cache (via drop caches) without a crash. I'll send a >> proper patch email after you take a look and make sure I did the right >> thing. > > Do you mind if I roll your change directly into my patch and reissue the set? > Or would you rather have an extra patch at this time? > > David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
