for the records: radosgw-admin key create --gen-secret --subuser=myuser:swift --key-type=swift git clone https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient.git cd python-swiftclient python setup.py install swift -v -A http://mycluster/auth/v1.0 -U myuser:swift --key='xxxxxxxxx' post mybucket -r .r:* On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Lorieri <lorieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > great! > > I will try this. > > Will it affect objects later put through S3 api ? > > Yes. It sets a flag on the bucket, and reads through the S3 api will > be the same as through the Swift api. It's just not possible to set > that flag via the S3 api. > > Yehuda > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Lorieri <lorieri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > There is a behavior in AWS S3 I could not reproduce in radosgw. > >> > > >> > If you create an empty bucket and makes it public, any object you put > >> > there will be public too, and will automatically be possible to > >> > access > >> > it by its http url. > >> > It is very helpful when people use some tools and browsers plugins to > >> > upload content or do a bulk sync. > >> > > >> > am I missing something ? > >> > >> The S3 ACLs don't allow that. Amazon provides a different orthogonal > >> scheme (bucket policies) that we don't support and that makes it > >> possible. > >> With the rados gateway you can achieve that if you're using the swift > >> api and setting the bucket public through it. > >> > >> > >> Yehuda > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
