Sage, Great. Is there some automated testing system that looks for regressions in cephfs that I can be watching for? - Milosz On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Milosz, > > I pulled both these into the testing branch. Thanks! > > sage > > On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Milosz Tanski wrote: > >> Currently ceph_invalidatepage has is overly eger with it's checks which are >> moot. The second change cleans up the case where offset is non zero. >> >> Please pull the from: >> https://bitbucket.org/adfin/linux-fs.git wip-invalidatepage >> >> This simple patchset came from the changes I made while working on fscache >> support for cephfs. Per Sage's request I split this up into smaller bites for >> testing and review. >> >> Milosz Tanski (2): >> ceph: Remove bogus check in invalidatepage >> ceph: cleanup the logic in ceph_invalidatepage >> >> fs/ceph/addr.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.8.1.2 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
