Re: [Xen-devel] Xen blktap driver for Ceph RBD : Anybody wants to test ? :p

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/08/13 14:55, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
Hi George,


Yes; qemu knows how to be a Xen PV block back-end.
Very interesting. Is there documentation about this somewhere ?
I had a look some time ago and it was really not very clear.

Things like what Xen version support this. And with which features (
indirect descriptors, persistent grants, discard, flush, ...) and/or
which limitation.

I don't think this is documented anywhere; you'll need to ask the experts. Stefano? Roger? Wei?



One of the reasons for stopping work on blktap3 (AIUI) was that it
should in theory have performance characteristics similar to blktap3,
And did anyone check the theory currently ? :)

I say "in theory" because they are using the same basic architecture: a normal process running in dom0, with no special kernel support. If there were a performance difference, it would be something that should (in theory) be able to be optimized.

I don't think we have comparisons between qdisk (which is what we call qemu-as-pv-backend in Xen) and blktap3 (and since blktap3 wasn't finished they wouldn't mean much anyway); but I think qdisk compares reasonably with blkback.

 -George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux