It seems to make sense that fiemap should be part of the `class BackingFileSystem` abstraction? On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > http://wiki.ceph.com/01Planning/02Blueprints/Emperor/osd:_ceph_on_zfs > > We've done some preliminary testing and xattr debugging that allows > ceph-osd to run on zfsforlinux using the normal writeahead journaling mode > (the same mode used for xfs and ext4). However, we aren't doing anything > special to take advantage of zfs's capabilities. > > This session would go over what is needed to make parallel journaling work > (which would leverage zfs snapshots). I would also like to have a > discussion about whether other longer-term possibilities, such as storing > objects directly using the DMU, make sense given what ceph-osd's > ObjectStore interface really needs. It might also be an appropriate time > to visit whether other snapshotting linux filesystems (like nilfs2) would > fit well into any generalization of the filestore code that comes out of > this effort. > > If anybody is interested in this, please add yourself to the interested > parties section (or claim ownership) of this blueprint! > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
