Re: Re: question about striped_read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:48 AM, majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >>On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, majianpeng wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi all,
>>>> >>>      I met a problem and ask somebody could help me.
>>>> >>> In func striped_read()
>>>> >>> > if (ret > 0) {
>>>> >>> >                int didpages = (page_align + ret) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> >                if (read < pos - off) {
>>>> >>> >                       dout(" zero gap %llu to %llu\n", off + read, pos);
>>>> >>> >                        ceph_zero_page_vector_range(page_align + read,
>>>> >>> >                                                    pos - off - read, pages);
>>>> >>> >                }
>>>> >>> >                pos += ret;
>>>>
>>>> I think you are right. probably above line should be 'pos += this_len'
>>>
>>>It should be easy to construct a simple test for this.  E.g., something
>>>like
>>>
>>> pwrite(fd, buf, 0, 3000000);
>>> pwrite(fd, buf, 4194304, 1000);
>>> pread(fd, buf, 0, 6000000);
>>> ...
>>>
>>>and whatever else to verify that pos was in fact advanced properly?
>>>
>> The following is my test code:
>> void hole_test()
>> {
>>         char buf[4194304];
>>         ssize_t ret;
>>         int fd = open("/media/ceph/test", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_DIRECT|O_TRUNC);
>>         if (fd < 0) {
>>                 printf("open error %s\n", strerror(errno));
>>                 return;
>>         }
>>
>>         ret = pwrite(fd, buf, 0, 3000000);
>>         ret = pwrite(fd, buf, 4194304, 1000);
>>         ret = pread(fd, buf , 0, 6000000);
>>         close(fd);
>> }
>>
>> The debug message from striped_read are:
>> [  267.530266] ceph:           file.c:356  : striped_read 6000000~0 (read 0) got 0
>> [  267.530270] ceph:           file.c:396  : striped_read returns 0
>>
>> The result isn't what's your said.
>> Am i missing something?
>>
>> BTW, i think Yan is ok,
>> The code
>> pos += ret; should pos += this_len.
>> Because this_len can larger than ret.
>> But the question is what's condition can cause this?
>
>by default, ceph strips file to 4M objects. In above example, the
>first object only has
>3M data, so 'ret = 3M'  and 'this_len = 4M'
actually, in func calc_layout: the read length is the smaller between object and left.
>
>> And can the short_read operation handle this situation?
>
>I don't think it's good idea to short read unless we really reach EOF.
Can you explain in detail?

Thanks
Jianpeng Ma
>
>Regards
>Yan, Zheng?韬{.n?????%??檩??w?{.n????u朕?Ф?塄}?财??j:+v??????2??璀??摺?囤??z夸z罐?+?????w棹f





[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux