pg_missing_t::is_missing semantics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

When testing if a specific version of an object is missing with pg_missing_t::is_missing
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/osd/osd_types.cc#L2153
if the version needed is greater than the version given in argument, false is returned.

Each object in pg_missing_t *have* a version and *need* another and *have* is lower than *need*. 
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/osd/osd_types.h#L1470

Here is what gets me confused:

  if (item.need > v)
    return false;
  return true;

A version lower than *need* is considered to not be missing ( by is_missing ) 
where a version greater than *need* is considered to be missing. 

This prototype of is_missing is used at

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc#L5910

  if (missing.is_missing(oid, v)) {
    dout(10) << "got missing " << oid << " v " << v << dendl;
    missing.got(oid, v);
    if (is_primary())
      missing_loc.erase(oid);

If the version is greater than the one needed ( i.e. it is more recent ) then it is not considered missing and therefore not removed from missing ( which is what pg_missing_t::got does ). 

Does it mean that when an object version is in missing, it will always be removed because the PG will receive an object that is either of the same version or lower ? And never receive an object of a version greater than the one in missing ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good people do nothing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux