On 05/10/13 19:02, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
Sounds to me like package versioning mismastch. Could it be that one of the ceph packages was on a different version (e.g., librados).
I attempted to install and run radosgw 0.61.1 on a system with a 0.56.4 librados and it segfaulted with the same backtrace as the one in this thread.
If a newer radosgw can't work with an older librados, this should be reflected on the package relationships -- hopefully without nasty Breaks/Conflicts, but with a proper librados SONAME bump that will allow coinstability between librados2 and e.g. librados3. Or symbol versioning could be employed to provide backwards compatibility.
This installed-but-segfaulting combination of packages shouldn't be allowed by apt to exist on the system. FWIW, if these were packages in Debian (and, presumably, Ubuntu), that would be a severity: serious/release critical bug.
It'd also be nice to be able to do things like mixing newer radosgw while also keeping the old librados2 on the system. My use case is that I have monitors and radosgw on the same boxes and I'd like to keep monitors on bobtail, while at the same time use some of the much needed radosgw cuttlefish features.
Regards, Faidon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
