On 05/11/2013 10:43 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
Get parent info for format 2 images on every refresh (rather than
just during the initial probe). This will be needed to detect the
disappearance of the parent image in the event a mapped image
becomes unlayered (i.e., flattened).
Switch to using a non-zero parent overlap value rather than the
existence of a parent (a non-null parent_spec pointer) to determine
whether to mark a request layered. It will soon be possible for
a layered image to become unlayered while a request is in flight.
This means that the layered flag for an image request indicates that
there was a non-zero parent overlap at the time the image request
was created. The parent overlap can change thereafter, which may
lead to special handling at request submission or completion time.
Flesh out and fix the rbd_dev_v2_header_info() error handling path.
This and the next several pages are related to:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3763
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/block/rbd.c | 72
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
index 3a8135f..06d49b5 100644
--- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ static struct rbd_img_request *rbd_img_request_create(
}
if (child_request)
img_request_child_set(img_request);
- if (rbd_dev->parent_spec)
+ if (rbd_dev->parent_overlap)
img_request_layered_set(img_request);
spin_lock_init(&img_request->completion_lock);
img_request->next_completion = 0;
@@ -4021,20 +4021,60 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_header_info(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev)
if (first_time) {
ret = rbd_dev_v2_header_onetime(rbd_dev);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ goto out_err;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the image supports layering, get the parent info. We
+ * need to probe the first time regardless. Thereafter we
+ * only need to if there's a parent, to see if it has
+ * disappeared due to the mapped image getting flattened.
+ */
+ if (rbd_dev->header.features & RBD_FEATURE_LAYERING &&
+ (first_time || rbd_dev->parent_spec)) {
+ bool warn;
+
+ ret = rbd_dev_v2_parent_info(rbd_dev);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_err;
+
+ /*
+ * Print a warning if this is the initial probe and
+ * the image has a parent. Don't print it if the
+ * image now being probed is itself a parent. We
+ * can tell at this point because we won't know its
+ * pool name yet (just its pool id).
+ */
+ warn = rbd_dev->parent_spec && rbd_dev->spec->pool_name;
+ if (first_time && warn)
+ rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "WARNING: kernel layering "
+ "is EXPERIMENTAL!");
}
ret = rbd_dev_v2_image_size(rbd_dev);
if (ret)
- goto out;
+ goto out_err;
+
if (rbd_dev->spec->snap_id == CEPH_NOSNAP)
if (rbd_dev->mapping.size != rbd_dev->header.image_size)
rbd_dev->mapping.size = rbd_dev->header.image_size;
ret = rbd_dev_v2_snap_context(rbd_dev);
dout("rbd_dev_v2_snap_context returned %d\n", ret);
- if (ret)
+ if (!ret)
goto out;
+out_err:
+ rbd_dev->mapping.size = 0;
+ rbd_dev->header.image_size = 0;
+ rbd_dev->header.obj_order = 0;
+ rbd_dev->parent_overlap = 0;
+ rbd_spec_put(rbd_dev->parent_spec);
+ rbd_dev->parent_spec = NULL;
+ rbd_dev->header.stripe_count = 0;
+ rbd_dev->header.stripe_unit = 0;
+ rbd_dev->header.features = 0;
+ kfree(rbd_dev->header.object_prefix);
+ rbd_dev->header.object_prefix = NULL;
There should probably be some warning here, since the device isn't
usable anymore after this.
I'm nervous about clearing these fields without locking around
their use. For example, rbd_request_fn() should skip new requests now
since mapping.size == 0, but it does not read the field safely, so
requests could still get through, and possibly use the new object
prefix (null) to create new objects that would not be cleaned up
by removing the image (since they used an irregular prefix).
There might be other less obvious effects for in-flight requests too.
Maybe a new flag indicating whether the header is valid would be
more useful than relying on individual fields being handled correctly
after an error reading the header occurs.
out:
up_write(&rbd_dev->header_rwsem);
@@ -4488,24 +4528,6 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_header_onetime(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev)
if (ret)
goto out_err;
- /* If the image supports layering, get the parent info */
-
- if (rbd_dev->header.features & RBD_FEATURE_LAYERING) {
- ret = rbd_dev_v2_parent_info(rbd_dev);
- if (ret)
- goto out_err;
- /*
- * Print a warning if this image has a parent.
- * Don't print it if the image now being probed
- * is itself a parent. We can tell at this point
- * because we won't know its pool name yet (just its
- * pool id).
- */
- if (rbd_dev->parent_spec && rbd_dev->spec->pool_name)
- rbd_warn(rbd_dev, "WARNING: kernel layering "
- "is EXPERIMENTAL!");
- }
-
/* If the image supports fancy striping, get its parameters */
if (rbd_dev->header.features & RBD_FEATURE_STRIPINGV2) {
@@ -4517,11 +4539,7 @@ static int rbd_dev_v2_header_onetime(struct
rbd_device *rbd_dev)
return 0;
out_err:
- rbd_dev->parent_overlap = 0;
- rbd_spec_put(rbd_dev->parent_spec);
- rbd_dev->parent_spec = NULL;
- kfree(rbd_dev->header_name);
- rbd_dev->header_name = NULL;
+ rbd_dev->header.features = 0;
kfree(rbd_dev->header.object_prefix);
rbd_dev->header.object_prefix = NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
