I was thinking about the seconds component. ----- "Sage Weil" <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Matt W. Benjamin wrote: > > > > ----- "Alex Elder" <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > A ceph timespec contains 32-bit unsigned values for its seconds > and > > > nanoseconds components. For a standard timespec, both fields are > > > signed, and the seconds field is almost surely 64 bits. > > > > Is the Ceph timespec going to change at some point? > > I don't think so. 32-bits is enough for the billion nanoseconds in a > > second. And I'm not sure if the signedness is used/useful... the ceph > > utime_t code always normalizes the ns result to be in [0, 1 billion). > > sage -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
