Am 19.04.2013 22:33, schrieb Sage Weil:
I think we can make the --dest-pool default to --pool instead of rbd...
that's easy enough, right?
Yes ;-) it doesn't hurt me but i've seen some people getting confused..
sage
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Am 19.04.2013 22:26, schrieb Dan Mick:
It's arguable, but we wanted to treat source and destination pools
separately in general.
Note that you can also specify images as POOLNAME/a and POOLNAME/b.
Sure i know that. But then -p does not make sense at all. Nobody want to use:
rbd -p POOLFORA rename a POOLFORB/b
Wouldn't it be constant to expand this for b? I mean renaming from poola to
poolb isn't supported anyway ;-)
Greets,
Stefan
On 04/19/2013 12:28 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hi,
if i issue rbd -p POOLNAME ... rename a b
It uses the POOL for a but not for b.
Output is then:
rbd: mv/rename across pools not supported
source pool: vmstorssd1 dest pool: rbd
Shouldn't it use the pool provided by -p for both?
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
