This patch fixes a bug in radosgw swift compatibility code, that is, if a not-owner but authorized user access a non-existing object in a container, he wiil receive unexpected error code, to repeat this bug, do the following steps, 1 User1 creates a container, and grants the read/write permission to user2 curl -X PUT -i -k -H "X-Auth-Token: $user1_token" $url/$container curl -X POST -i -k -H "X-Auth-Token: $user1_token" -H "X-Container-Read: $user2" -H "X-Container-Write: $user2" $url/$container 2 User2 queries the object 'obj' in the newly created container by using HEAD instruction, note the container currently is empty curl -X HEAD -i -k -H "X-Auth-Token: $user2_token" $url/$container/obj 3 The response received by user2 is '401 Authorization Required', rather than the expected '404 Not Found', the details are as follows, HTTP/1.1 401 Authorization Required Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:52:49 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 12 Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Signed-off-by: Yunchuan Wen <yunchuanwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <liwang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src/rgw/rgw_acl.cc | 11 +++++++++-- src/rgw/rgw_common.cc | 22 ++-------------------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/rgw/rgw_acl.cc b/src/rgw/rgw_acl.cc index 1a90649..a27feec 100644 --- a/src/rgw/rgw_acl.cc +++ b/src/rgw/rgw_acl.cc @@ -93,6 +93,13 @@ int RGWAccessControlPolicy::get_perm(string& id, int perm_mask) { bool RGWAccessControlPolicy::verify_permission(string& uid, int user_perm_mask, int perm) { int test_perm = perm; + + if (test_perm & (RGW_PERM_READ | RGW_PERM_READ_ACP)) { + test_perm |= RGW_PERM_READ_OBJS; + } + if (test_perm & (RGW_PERM_WRITE | RGW_PERM_WRITE_ACP)) { + test_perm |= RGW_PERM_WRITE_OBJS; + } int policy_perm = get_perm(uid, test_perm); @@ -101,10 +108,10 @@ bool RGWAccessControlPolicy::verify_permission(string& uid, int user_perm_mask, buckets, so the swift READ permission on bucket will allow listing the bucket content */ if (policy_perm & RGW_PERM_WRITE_OBJS) { - policy_perm |= (RGW_PERM_WRITE | RGW_PERM_WRITE_ACP); + policy_perm |= (RGW_PERM_WRITE | RGW_PERM_WRITE_ACP) & perm; } if (policy_perm & RGW_PERM_READ_OBJS) { - policy_perm |= (RGW_PERM_READ | RGW_PERM_READ_ACP); + policy_perm |= (RGW_PERM_READ | RGW_PERM_READ_ACP) & perm; } int acl_perm = policy_perm & user_perm_mask; diff --git a/src/rgw/rgw_common.cc b/src/rgw/rgw_common.cc index d9c0a80..7b5b6c0 100644 --- a/src/rgw/rgw_common.cc +++ b/src/rgw/rgw_common.cc @@ -515,14 +515,6 @@ bool verify_bucket_permission(struct req_state *s, int perm) if ((perm & (int)s->perm_mask) != perm) return false; - if (s->bucket_acl->verify_permission(s->user.user_id, perm, perm)) - return true; - - if (perm & (RGW_PERM_READ | RGW_PERM_READ_ACP)) - perm |= RGW_PERM_READ_OBJS; - if (perm & RGW_PERM_WRITE) - perm |= RGW_PERM_WRITE_OBJS; - return s->bucket_acl->verify_permission(s->user.user_id, perm, perm); } @@ -540,18 +532,8 @@ bool verify_object_permission(struct req_state *s, RGWAccessControlPolicy *bucke if ((perm & (int)s->perm_mask) != perm) return false; - - int swift_perm = 0; - if (perm & (RGW_PERM_READ | RGW_PERM_READ_ACP)) - swift_perm |= RGW_PERM_READ_OBJS; - if (perm & RGW_PERM_WRITE) - swift_perm |= RGW_PERM_WRITE_OBJS; - - if (!swift_perm) - return false; - /* we already verified the user mask above, so we pass swift_perm as the mask here, - otherwise the mask might not cover the swift permissions bits */ - return bucket_acl->verify_permission(s->user.user_id, swift_perm, swift_perm); + + return bucket_acl->verify_permission(s->user.user_id, s->perm_mask, perm); } bool verify_object_permission(struct req_state *s, int perm) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html