I've merged this series into the testing branch, with appropriate Reviewed-by tags from me (and Sage on #4). Thanks much for the code and helping me go through it. :) -Greg Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com On Monday, March 4, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Yan, Zheng wrote: > On 03/05/2013 02:49 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > These patches are also in: > > > git://github.com/ukernel/linux.git (http://github.com/ukernel/linux.git) wip-ceph > > > > > > > > 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 all look good to me. If you can double-check Sage's > > concerns on 4 and my questions on 6 I'll be happy to pull these in. :) > > > > I rechecked locking assumption in patch 4, nothing goes wrong. > > Regards > Yan, Zheng > > > -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
