Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Understanding delays due to throttling under very heavy write load

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sage,

On 02/20/2013 05:12 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> I'm resurrecting an ancient thread here, but: we've just observed this on 
> another big cluster and remembered that this hasn't actually been fixed.

Sorry for the delayed reply - I missed this in a backlog
of unread email...

> 
> I think the right solution is to make an option that will setsockopt on 
> SO_RECVBUF to some value (say, 256KB).  I pushed a branch that does this, 
> wip-tcp.  Do you mind checking to see if this addresses the issue (without 
> manually adjusting things in /proc)?

I'll be happy to test it out...

> 
> And perhaps we should consider making this default to 256KB...

That's the value I've been using with my /proc adjustments
since I figured out what was going on.  My servers use
a 10 GbE port for each of the cluster and public networks,
with cephfs clients using 1 GbE, and I've not detected any
issues resulting from that value.  So, it seems like a decent
starting point for a default...

-- Jim

> 
> Thanks!
> sage
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux