Can you confirm that the memory size reported is res? -Sam On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Christopher Kunz <chrislist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 16.02.13 10:09, schrieb Wido den Hollander: >> On 02/16/2013 08:09 AM, Andrey Korolyov wrote: >>> Can anyone who hit this bug please confirm that your system contains >>> libc 2.15+? >>> >> > Hello, > > when we started a deep scrub on our 0.56.2 cluster today, we saw a > massive memleak about 1 hour into the scrub. One OSD claimed over > 53GByte within 10 minutes. We had to restart the OSD to keep the cluster > stable. > > Another OSD is currently claiming about 27GByte and will be restarted > soon. All circumstantial evidence points to the deep scrub as the source > of the leak. > > One affected node is running libc 2.15 (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS), the other one > is using libc 2.11.3 (Debian Squeeze). So it seems this is not a > libc-dependant issue. > > We have disabled scrub completely. > > Regards, > > --ck > > PS: Do we have any idea when this will be fixed? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
