On Sunday, January 20, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2013/1/20 Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxxxx)>: > > This is a bit embarrassing, but if you're actually using two networks and the cluster network fails but the client network stays up, things behave pretty badly (the OSDs will keep insisting it's failed, while the monitor will insist it's still working). I believe there's a branch working on this problem, but I haven't been involved with it. > > It's not necessary to have split networks though, no. > > > > Ok. > > > Does that answer your question? > > Absolutely, but usually cluster network is faster than client network > and being forced to use two cluster network is very very expensive. I'm not quite sure what you mean…the use of the "cluster network" and "public network" are really just intended as conveniences for people with multiple NICs on their box. There's nothing preventing you from running everything on the same network…(and more specifically, from different speed grades to different boxes, but keeping them all on the same network). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
