On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Noah Watkins <jayhawk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Danny Al-Gaaf <danny.al-gaaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 15.01.2013 10:04, schrieb James Page: >>> On 12/01/13 16:36, Noah Watkins wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Gary Lowell >>>> <gary.lowell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I would also prefer to not add another huge build dependency to ceph, >> especially since it's e.g. not supported by SLES11 and since ceph >> currently builds fine (even with these small warnings from autotools). > > Ahh, I had in my head a separate repository for Java bindings managed > by maven (or ant). Either way, I have no strong opinion -- we only > have one junit dependency :) I don't believe Ceph currently requires any Java to build, and it's going to remain that way if I have anything to say about it. ;) Hadoop bindings can be packaged in about a billion different ways that don't require core Ceph to depend on a Java toolchain. -Greg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
