On 01/09/2013 08:59 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/09/2013 01:53 AM, Chen, Xiaoxi wrote: >> Hi， >> Setting rep size to 3 only make the data triple-replication, that means when you "fail" all OSDs in 2 out of 3 DCs, the data still accessable. >> But Monitor is another story, for monitor clusters with 2N+1 nodes, it require at least N+1 nodes alive, and indeed this is why you Ceph failed. >> It looks to me this discipline make it hard to design a proper deployment which is robust in DC outage. But hoping for inputs from community,how to make Monitor cluster reliable. >> > > From what I understand he didn't kill the second mon, still leaving 2 > out of 3 mons running. Indeed. A good hint that this is the case is this bit of Shawn's message: >> When I fail a datacenter (including 1 of 3 mon's) I eventually get: >> 2013-01-08 13:58:54.020477 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v2712139: 7104 pgs: 7104 active+degraded; 60264 MB data, 137 GB used, 13570 GB / 14146 GB avail; 16362/49086 degraded (33.333%) >> >> At this point everything is still ok. But when I fail the 2nd datacenter (still leaving 2 out of 3 mons running) I get: >> 2013-01-08 14:01:25.600056 mon.0 [INF] pgmap v2712189: 7104 pgs: 7104 incomplete; 60264 MB data, 137 GB used, 13570 GB / 14146 GB avail If you still manage to get these messages, it means your monitors are still handling and answering requests, and that only happens when you have a quorum :) -Joao -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
