Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> Yeah, it's missing a guard here. Strange, I remember fixing this and
> others, but I can't find any trace of that. I think setting it to
> empty string is ok, though we may want to explore other fixes
> (configurable?) -- it affects the Location field in S3 POST response.

Yes, I've seen it's used there. Since we have dedicated gw machines,
they're at the root / so doesn't matter.

BTW, do you know why the stack trace sucks so much ? I mean, it looks
especially unhelpful, the function where the crash happen isn't even
listed in there at all ...

Cheers,

    Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux