On 12/17/2012 03:28 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 11:09 AM, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 12/17/2012 10:49 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012, Alex Elder wrote:
>>>> On 12/14/2012 11:17 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>>>> Most of the code uses int64_t/__s64 for the pool id, although in a few
>>>>> cases we screwed up and limited it to 32 bits. In reality, that's way
>>>>> overkill anyway; we could have left it at 32 bits to begin with.
>
> I just wanted to follow up on this. Sage and I discussed
> this today. He said that most of the other code involving
> pool id's assume they are signed, so a negative pool id
> indicates an error. Rather than introduce another new
> way pool id's could be (mis)interpreted I agreed to rework
> this patch so that it follows that basic pattern (i.e.,
> considering pool id's signed).
>
> I haven't looked at it closely yet but I still expect to
> have a revised patch, though it's possible I'll conclude
> leaving things as-is is best.
OK, I've looked at it now. If we're not going to make
the change I proposed, we might as well not make a change
at all.
This was trying to make an incomplete fix to a much larger
problem. We'll try to get the bigger problem fixed another
day.
I'm retracting this patch from consideration.
-Alex
> Some future cleanup task can take care of unifying everything
> to 64 bits (or possibly 32 bits), but that's another day.
>
> -Alex
>
>
>>>> The differing types representing the same abstraction are precisely
>>>> the point of making this change. What really needs to happen is we
>>>> need to fix *that*; that is, decide whether a pool id is 32 or 64
>>>> bits, signed or not, and then make sure it's that and only that
>>>> throughout the code.
>>>>
>>>> In the mean time, this change is defensive, making sure there's
>>>> no uncertainty in what we're dealing with within rbd. The code
>>>> will guarantee some future change won't inadvertently let a
>>>> wrong-sized pool id attempt to sneak through an interface
>>>> unnoticed. It may seem like overkill but this kind of bug is
>>>> really hard to track down, and it's better to simply preclude
>>>> it from happening.
>>>>
>>>>> My first instinct would be to change the return type to long long or s64
>>>>> and avoid the use magic #defines...
>>>>
>>>> I absolutely like using base types (like long long). But where
>>>> those types are used to represent a true abstraction (like a
>>>> snapshot id, or a pool id), it is the one place I think the use
>>>> of typedefs and "magic #defines" is actually a real help because
>>>> it makes explicit you're working with something more than an (e.g.)
>>>> an int. A typedef makes obviously to the reader that it's restricted
>>>> a bit (so, for example, it isn't meaningful to do math on it).
>>>
>>> Completely agreed.
>>>
>>>> And symbolic constants make it a lot easier to search through
>>>> code for special situations like this.
>>>
>>> Okay with me. Just keep in mind that most of the other code looks for a
>>> negative int64_t return value (i.e., the pool id is 63 bits).
>>
>> I.e., if I do this here but not elsewhere we're subject to
>> the same kind of "someday" problems... In fact, it's just
>> a different form of mismatched type--here returning an unsigned
>> when elsewhere a signed value is assumed.
>>
>> I still like the symbolic values, or in this case, maybe
>> a macro ceph_pool_id_valid() or something. It just makes
>> it easier to make other changes later, because you can
>> easily (or maybe more precisely) search for the effects
>> of a proposed change.
>>
>> I find the time spent searching through code is large
>> enough that I tend to do things in a way that facilitates
>> that.
>>
>> Let's talk about this today and come to an agreement
>> about the best way to resolve this.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>> The reason there is a mismatch: it used to be a 32-bit value, and at one
>>> point we thought we'd do a pool per radosgw bucket and did a huge
>>> conversion to 64-bit. And missed a few places. The whole transition was
>>> ill-conceived and generally a bad idea, though; we should never have that
>>> many pools. So it's not clear it's worth the effort to spend another
>>> feature bit to fix it up.
>>>
>>> sage
>>>
>>>> This stuff is all sort of philosophical rather than technical.
>>>> The code before works, and the code as I've changed it works.
>>>>
>>>> Anybody else have thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Alex Elder wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently ceph_pg_poolid_by_name() returns an int, which is used to
>>>>>> encode a ceph pool id. This could be a problem because a pool id
>>>>>> (at least in some cases) is a 64-bit value. We have a defined pool
>>>>>> id value that represents "no pool," and that's a very sensible
>>>>>> return value here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch changes ceph_pg_poolid_by_name() to return a 64-bit
>>>>>> pool id value, or CEPH_NOPOOL if the named pool is not found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The patch also gratuitously renames the function, separating "pool"
>>>>>> from "id" in the name by an underscore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/block/rbd.c | 6 +++---
>>>>>> include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h | 2 +-
>>>>>> net/ceph/osdmap.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>>>>> index 4daa400..706824b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
>>>>>> @@ -3642,11 +3642,11 @@ static ssize_t rbd_add(struct bus_type *bus,
>>>>>> ceph_opts = NULL; /* rbd_dev client now owns this */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* pick the pool */
>>>>>> + rc = -ENOENT;
>>>>>> osdc = &rbdc->client->osdc;
>>>>>> - rc = ceph_pg_poolid_by_name(osdc->osdmap, spec->pool_name);
>>>>>> - if (rc < 0)
>>>>>> + spec->pool_id = ceph_pg_pool_id_by_name(osdc->osdmap, spec->pool_name);
>>>>>> + if (spec->pool_id == CEPH_NOPOOL)
>>>>>> goto err_out_client;
>>>>>> - spec->pool_id = (u64) rc;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rbd_dev = rbd_dev_create(rbdc, spec);
>>>>>> if (!rbd_dev)
>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h b/include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h
>>>>>> index 5ea57ba..c841396 100644
>>>>>> --- a/include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h
>>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/ceph/osdmap.h
>>>>>> @@ -124,6 +124,6 @@ extern int ceph_calc_pg_primary(struct ceph_osdmap
>>>>>> *osdmap,
>>>>>> struct ceph_pg pgid);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> extern const char *ceph_pg_pool_name_by_id(struct ceph_osdmap *map, u64
>>>>>> id);
>>>>>> -extern int ceph_pg_poolid_by_name(struct ceph_osdmap *map, const char
>>>>>> *name);
>>>>>> +extern __u64 ceph_pg_pool_id_by_name(struct ceph_osdmap *map, const
>>>>>> char *name);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>> diff --git a/net/ceph/osdmap.c b/net/ceph/osdmap.c
>>>>>> index de73214..27e904e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/net/ceph/osdmap.c
>>>>>> +++ b/net/ceph/osdmap.c
>>>>>> @@ -485,19 +485,21 @@ const char *ceph_pg_pool_name_by_id(struct
>>>>>> ceph_osdmap *map, u64 id)
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_pg_pool_name_by_id);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -int ceph_pg_poolid_by_name(struct ceph_osdmap *map, const char *name)
>>>>>> +__u64 ceph_pg_pool_id_by_name(struct ceph_osdmap *map, const char *name)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> struct rb_node *rbp;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for (rbp = rb_first(&map->pg_pools); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
>>>>>> - struct ceph_pg_pool_info *pi =
>>>>>> - rb_entry(rbp, struct ceph_pg_pool_info, node);
>>>>>> + struct ceph_pg_pool_info *pi;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pi = rb_entry(rbp, struct ceph_pg_pool_info, node);
>>>>>> if (pi->name && strcmp(pi->name, name) == 0)
>>>>>> - return pi->id;
>>>>>> + return (__u64) pi->id;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> - return -ENOENT;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return CEPH_NOPOOL;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_pg_poolid_by_name);
>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ceph_pg_pool_id_by_name);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static void __remove_pg_pool(struct rb_root *root, struct
>>>>>> ceph_pg_pool_info *pi)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
