On 12/14/2012 03:41 PM, Jim Schutt wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at commit e3ed28eb2 in the next branch,
and I have a question.
Shouldn't the limit be pg_num > 65536, because
PGs are numbered 0 thru pg_num-1?
If not, what am I missing?
FWIW, up through yesterday I've been using the next branch and this:
ceph osd pool set data pg_num 65536 --allow-experimental-feature
ceph osd pool set metadata pg_num 65536 --allow-experimental-feature
ceph osd pool set data pgp_num 65536 --allow-experimental-feature
ceph osd pool set metadata pgp_num 65536 --allow-experimental-feature
using cephfs clients, and have seen no trouble with
misdirected ops, etc.
-- Jim
Hi Jim,
To the best of my knowledge, one of the things that triggered the
required hard cap on the number of pgs was that the kernel side is still
limited to 16 bits, despite that on the osd side this is no longer true.
I'm not familiar with what's going on on the kernel side, but if there's
a slight chance that we are indeed keeping the 'pg_num' on a 16-bit
variable, then that value must be capped to 65535. If that's not the
case and we're just limited by the pg's number/id, then I guess that
accepting up to 65636 would be fine (0..65535).
Just in case I'll look into this and further implications.
Thanks.
-Joao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
