Re: 0.55 init script Issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:17 PM, James Page <james.page@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > On 05/12/12 19:41, Dan Mick wrote:
> > >> The story as best I know it is that we're trying to transition to
> > >> and use upstart where possible, but that the upstart config does
> > >> not (yet?) try to do what the init.d config did.  That is, it
> > >> doesn't support options to the one script, but rather separates
> > >> daemons into separate services, and does not reach out to remote
> > >> machines to start daemons, etc.
> > >>
> > >> The intent is that init.d/ceph is left for non-Upstart distros,
> > >> AFAICT.
> > >>
> > >> Tv had some design notes here:
> > >>
> > >> http://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg09314.html
> > >>
> > >>  We need better documentation/rationale here at least.
> > >
> > > Maybe it might be better if the ceph init script and the ceph upstart
> > > configuration did not namespace clash; how about shifting the name of
> > > the ceph upstart configuration to ceph-all?
> > 
> > Yeah, this or something very similar is definitely the correct
> > solution. Sage recently added the "ceph" upstart job, and we didn't
> > put it through sufficient verification prior to release in order to
> > notice this issue. Users who aren't using upstart (I expect that's all
> > of them) should just delete the job after running the package install.
> > We'll certainly sort this out prior to the next release; I'm not sure
> > if we want to roll a v0.55.1 right away or not.
> 
> Let's push it to the testing branch, but make sure any other fixes are 
> there before rolling a .1.. maybe tomorrow?

I've pushed this to the testing branch.  If someone wants to verify the 
packages built at 

	http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-deb-precise-x86_64-basic/ref/testing/

are fixed, that would be fabulous!

sage


> Thanks!
> sage
> 
> 
> > -Greg
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> > 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux