Am 24.11.2012 18:16, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
At the machine compiling? Yes!
Hmm, I just tested on my wonky wheezy machine (glibc 2.13, 3.2) and
system(SYS_syncfs, ..) works for me. But the #define is in libc6-dev:
But that means your glibc supports it. Then we don't need the syscall at
all.
To me it's only present in the kernel headers (linux-libc-dev) like this:
[pb64: ~]# grep -r syncfs /usr/include
/usr/include/asm/unistd_64.h:#define __NR_syncfs
306
/usr/include/asm/unistd_64.h:__SYSCALL(__NR_syncfs, sys_syncfs)
/usr/include/asm/unistd_32.h:#define __NR_syncfs 344
/usr/include/asm-generic/unistd.h:#define __NR_syncfs 267
/usr/include/asm-generic/unistd.h:__SYSCALL(__NR_syncfs, sys_syncfs)
Greets,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
