Re: [PATCH] overflow of int ret: use ssize_t for ret

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23 November 2012 14:11, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/block/rbd.c b/block/rbd.c
>> index 5a0f79f..0384c6c 100644
>> --- a/block/rbd.c
>> +++ b/block/rbd.c
>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ typedef enum {
>>  typedef struct RBDAIOCB {
>>      BlockDriverAIOCB common;
>>      QEMUBH *bh;
>> -    int ret;
>> +    ssize_t ret;
>>      QEMUIOVector *qiov;
>>      char *bounce;
>>      RBDAIOCmd cmd;
>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ typedef struct RADOSCB {
>>      int done;
>>      int64_t size;
>>      char *buf;
>> -    int ret;
>> +    ssize_t ret;
>>  } RADOSCB;
>>
>>  #define RBD_FD_READ 0
>
> I preferred your previous patch:
>
> ssize_t on 32-bit hosts has sizeof(ssize_t) == 4.  In
> qemu_rbd_complete_aio() we may assign acb->ret = rcb->size.  Here the
> size field is int64_t, so ssize_t ret would truncate the value.

The rcb size field should be a size_t: it is used for calling
rbd_aio_write and rbd_aio_read so if we've overflowed 32 bits
then we've already got a problem there.

-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux