Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
From: ruslan usifov <ruslan.usifov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:33:02 +0400
Cc: ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211200849080.7369@cobra.newdream.net>
References: <CAHULbCmY6j3GbRFs_fyO1VP5_-BG5Cg1H_Kvfg1nN3jMMpyvHA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211200849080.7369@cobra.newdream.net>

So, not possible use ceph as scalable block device without visualization?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
  - From: Gregory Farnum

References:
- does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
  - From: ruslan usifov
- Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
  - From: Sage Weil

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] make mkcephfs and init-ceph osd filesystem handling more flexible
Next by Date: 'zombie snapshot' problem
Previous by thread: Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
Next by thread: Re: does still not recommended place rbd device on nodes, where osd daemon located?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [CEPH Users] [Ceph Large] [Information on CEPH] [Linux BTRFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux