A user has noticed some surprising behavior with the rbd command-line
tool: with rbd copy, if the destination pool is not set (either with
--dest-pool or by specifying destpool/image), then it is assumed to be
the source pool name.
This seems to me only marginally convenient, and much more confusing;
given how easy it is to specify the pool if it matters, and given the
fact that the default pool is always 'rbd' for all other operations, I
think it makes much more sense for the destination of a copy to default
to 'rbd' unless otherwise specified.
I propose to make this change. Does anyone think it's a bad idea?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
