Re: syncfs slower than without syncfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Whew, glad you found the problem Stefan! I was starting to wonder what was going on. :) Do you mind filling a bug about the control dependencies?

Mark

On 11/07/2012 07:31 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Am 07.11.2012 10:41, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Hello list,

syncfs is much slower than without syncfs to me.

If i compile latest ceph master with wip-rbd-read:

with syncfs:
rand 4K:
   write: io=1133MB, bw=12853KB/s, iops=3213, runt= 90277msec
   read : io=1239MB, bw=14046KB/s, iops=3511, runt= 90325msec
seq 4M:
   write: io=37560MB, bw=423874KB/s, iops=103, runt= 90738msec
   read : io=103852MB, bw=1151MB/s, iops=287, runt= 90237msec

without syncfs:
rand 4K:
   write: io=3733MB, bw=42459KB/s, iops=10614, runt= 90039msec
   read : io=6018MB, bw=68446KB/s, iops=17111, runt= 90038msec
seq 4M:
   write: io=51204MB, bw=577328KB/s, iops=140, runt= 90820msec
   read : io=150320MB, bw=1666MB/s, iops=416, runt= 90228msec

I thought syncfs should boost the performance.

Fixed - my chroot env with glibc syncfs support didn't had the libcrypto
installed and it isn't in the control dependencies. Now with libcrypto i
get the same results as without syncfs.

Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [CEPH Users]     [Ceph Large]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux